<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (4) TMI 146 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51875</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Mumbai clarified the definition of &#039;meter length&#039; under Rule 96ZI for embroidery machines, specifying it as the distance between the points of the first and last needles of only one roller. The amendment applies retrospectively, and the tribunal dismissed the department&#039;s appeal based on this clarification and previous court decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 10:14:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=90353" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (4) TMI 146 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51875</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Mumbai clarified the definition of &#039;meter length&#039; under Rule 96ZI for embroidery machines, specifying it as the distance between the points of the first and last needles of only one roller. The amendment applies retrospectively, and the tribunal dismissed the department&#039;s appeal based on this clarification and previous court decisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51875</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>