<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (2) TMI 1930 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468872</link>
    <description>Cash deposits were examined under section 69 as unexplained money, and the assessee supported the explanation with return particulars, land records, affidavits of purchasers, and evidence of sale of cattle, a bullock cart, and agricultural land. The material, together with remand proceedings, showed the deposits broadly matched the available cash flow, although some supporting documents were treated as self-serving and not enough for full deletion. Applying the CBDT verification guidelines for senior citizens as a reference point for scrutiny of cash deposits, the addition was not sustained in full and was restricted to a lump sum of Rs. 2,00,000, with the balance relief allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 24 May 2026 11:41:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=903514" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (2) TMI 1930 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468872</link>
      <description>Cash deposits were examined under section 69 as unexplained money, and the assessee supported the explanation with return particulars, land records, affidavits of purchasers, and evidence of sale of cattle, a bullock cart, and agricultural land. The material, together with remand proceedings, showed the deposits broadly matched the available cash flow, although some supporting documents were treated as self-serving and not enough for full deletion. Applying the CBDT verification guidelines for senior citizens as a reference point for scrutiny of cash deposits, the addition was not sustained in full and was restricted to a lump sum of Rs. 2,00,000, with the balance relief allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468872</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>