<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 1811 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468862</link>
    <description>Reassessment notices carried forward from the old regime under the post-2021 procedure must still be issued within the surviving limitation period after excluding the time lawfully available under section 148A(b). Applying that principle, the fresh section 148 notice was issued after the remaining time had expired, so it was time-barred, invalid, and without jurisdiction. The reassessment orders founded on that notice could not be sustained and were quashed in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 May 2026 13:30:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=903494" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 1811 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468862</link>
      <description>Reassessment notices carried forward from the old regime under the post-2021 procedure must still be issued within the surviving limitation period after excluding the time lawfully available under section 148A(b). Applying that principle, the fresh section 148 notice was issued after the remaining time had expired, so it was time-barred, invalid, and without jurisdiction. The reassessment orders founded on that notice could not be sustained and were quashed in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468862</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>