<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>The Great Unchaining: Can India Escape China&#039;s Supply-Chain Grip?</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=16479</link>
    <description>China&#039;s reported Decrees 834 and 835 expand regulatory control over technology transfer, data flows, personnel movement, and supply-chain restructuring by companies operating within China, including personal liability for executives and coordinated enforcement across jurisdictions. The article says these measures formalise and extend China&#039;s broader strategy of retaining global manufacturing ecosystems within its regulatory reach, while India&#039;s electronics, semiconductor, and supply-chain diversification plans remain vulnerable to resulting compliance friction, rules-of-origin scrutiny, and supply-chain disruption. It further stresses the need for stronger customs compliance, dual-use export controls, trusted-trader recognition, and domestic capacity in critical materials and components.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2026 08:28:18 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 May 2026 08:28:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=903469" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>The Great Unchaining: Can India Escape China&#039;s Supply-Chain Grip?</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=16479</link>
      <description>China&#039;s reported Decrees 834 and 835 expand regulatory control over technology transfer, data flows, personnel movement, and supply-chain restructuring by companies operating within China, including personal liability for executives and coordinated enforcement across jurisdictions. The article says these measures formalise and extend China&#039;s broader strategy of retaining global manufacturing ecosystems within its regulatory reach, while India&#039;s electronics, semiconductor, and supply-chain diversification plans remain vulnerable to resulting compliance friction, rules-of-origin scrutiny, and supply-chain disruption. It further stresses the need for stronger customs compliance, dual-use export controls, trusted-trader recognition, and domestic capacity in critical materials and components.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Other Topics</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2026 08:28:18 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=16479</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>