<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (5) TMI 1296 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792094</link>
    <description>Rule 8(3A) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002, which required duty payment on a consignment-to-consignment basis, had already been declared ultra vires by the High Court, and the Revenue&#039;s challenge before the Supreme Court was not pressed. That left the High Court ruling undisturbed and treated as final. Applying its earlier decisions, the Tribunal held that a demand founded on that provision could not survive, and the associated interest and penalty were also unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 May 2026 08:27:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=903464" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (5) TMI 1296 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792094</link>
      <description>Rule 8(3A) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002, which required duty payment on a consignment-to-consignment basis, had already been declared ultra vires by the High Court, and the Revenue&#039;s challenge before the Supreme Court was not pressed. That left the High Court ruling undisturbed and treated as final. Applying its earlier decisions, the Tribunal held that a demand founded on that provision could not survive, and the associated interest and penalty were also unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792094</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>