<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (5) TMI 1300 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792098</link>
    <description>Abatement under Notification No. 01/2006-ST, as amended, was unavailable where the assessee had availed Cenvat credit on input services used for restaurant and accommodation services. The notification conditions required non-availment of credit on inputs, capital goods and input services relating to the taxable services, and exemption provisions were to be strictly construed. Because credit had been taken on services such as maintenance, internet and courier, and no convincing material showed absence of nexus with the hotel services, the assessee failed to prove full compliance. The abatement claim was therefore rejected and the demand sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 May 2026 08:27:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=903460" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (5) TMI 1300 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792098</link>
      <description>Abatement under Notification No. 01/2006-ST, as amended, was unavailable where the assessee had availed Cenvat credit on input services used for restaurant and accommodation services. The notification conditions required non-availment of credit on inputs, capital goods and input services relating to the taxable services, and exemption provisions were to be strictly construed. Because credit had been taken on services such as maintenance, internet and courier, and no convincing material showed absence of nexus with the hotel services, the assessee failed to prove full compliance. The abatement claim was therefore rejected and the demand sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792098</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>