<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (5) TMI 1338 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792136</link>
    <description>In capital-gains computation, expenditure deductible under section 48 must have a direct and exclusive nexus with the transfer, so the travel-related claim required fresh factual verification and was remanded to the Assessing Officer. Deposits for maintenance, electricity and water were treated as integral to acquiring possession of the flat and were allowed as part of the cost of acquisition. Interest on the housing loan was also allowed as capital cost and eligible for indexation, as it had not been claimed under the house-property head in earlier years and the relevant limitation objection did not apply. The delay in filing the appeal was condoned for sufficient cause.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 May 2026 08:27:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=903422" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (5) TMI 1338 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792136</link>
      <description>In capital-gains computation, expenditure deductible under section 48 must have a direct and exclusive nexus with the transfer, so the travel-related claim required fresh factual verification and was remanded to the Assessing Officer. Deposits for maintenance, electricity and water were treated as integral to acquiring possession of the flat and were allowed as part of the cost of acquisition. Interest on the housing loan was also allowed as capital cost and eligible for indexation, as it had not been claimed under the house-property head in earlier years and the relevant limitation objection did not apply. The delay in filing the appeal was condoned for sufficient cause.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792136</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>