<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (5) TMI 1356 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792154</link>
    <description>A composite GST assessment order covering multiple financial years was treated as impermissible because a single assessment or show-cause process cannot validly span more than one tax period in the manner found in the cited precedent. The challenge was confined to that composite structure, and the assessment was therefore set aside. Fresh proceedings may be commenced separately for each assessment year, while the remaining grounds were left open.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 May 2026 08:27:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=903404" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (5) TMI 1356 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792154</link>
      <description>A composite GST assessment order covering multiple financial years was treated as impermissible because a single assessment or show-cause process cannot validly span more than one tax period in the manner found in the cited precedent. The challenge was confined to that composite structure, and the assessment was therefore set aside. Fresh proceedings may be commenced separately for each assessment year, while the remaining grounds were left open.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792154</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>