<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (6) TMI 35 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51860</link>
    <description>Where an exporter&#039;s disclosures are materially deficient, contradictory, or unreliable, the Designated Authority may treat it as non-cooperative and determine normal value from facts available, including partial reliance on the exporter&#039;s material and other sources. In a review of anti-dumping duty, the proper inquiry is whether injury is likely to recur if the duty is withdrawn, and the injury criteria are not a mere checklist. On the record showing rising import volumes, lower import prices, price undercutting, and continued pressure on the domestic industry, continuation of the duty was upheld and the challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2010 18:48:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=90338" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (6) TMI 35 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51860</link>
      <description>Where an exporter&#039;s disclosures are materially deficient, contradictory, or unreliable, the Designated Authority may treat it as non-cooperative and determine normal value from facts available, including partial reliance on the exporter&#039;s material and other sources. In a review of anti-dumping duty, the proper inquiry is whether injury is likely to recur if the duty is withdrawn, and the injury criteria are not a mere checklist. On the record showing rising import volumes, lower import prices, price undercutting, and continued pressure on the domestic industry, continuation of the duty was upheld and the challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51860</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>