<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (2) TMI 1922 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468846</link>
    <description>Penalty for under-reporting of income was not sustainable where interest income had been correctly declared in the original return and consistently offered in other years. An incomplete return uploaded in response to a defect notice omitted the interest amount from the relevant schedule, although the income remained disclosed in the return papers. The defect notice incorrectly proceeded on the basis that a tax audit report was required despite the inapplicability of the tax-audit provisions. Prompt rectification efforts and the absence of evidence of deliberate suppression established that the omission resulted from a technological or inadvertent error, rather than conscious under-reporting.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 May 2026 19:11:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=903345" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (2) TMI 1922 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468846</link>
      <description>Penalty for under-reporting of income was not sustainable where interest income had been correctly declared in the original return and consistently offered in other years. An incomplete return uploaded in response to a defect notice omitted the interest amount from the relevant schedule, although the income remained disclosed in the return papers. The defect notice incorrectly proceeded on the basis that a tax audit report was required despite the inapplicability of the tax-audit provisions. Prompt rectification efforts and the absence of evidence of deliberate suppression established that the omission resulted from a technological or inadvertent error, rather than conscious under-reporting.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468846</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>