https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468824 Electricity dues claimed against a lessee were treated as time-barred under Section 56(2) of the Electricity Act, 2003 because recovery notices came after the two-year period from when the sum first became due, and later notices could not revive limitation once supply had been disconnected and the agreement terminated. The text also states that, after the respondents invoked the statutory revenue recovery mechanism for the same dues, they could not additionally use disconnection under Section 56(1) as a coercive recovery tool, absent bona fide billing error. Disconnection was therefore not permissible, while recovery through the revenue recovery process could continue. en-us Wed, 25 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 22 May 2026 10:59:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468824 Electricity dues claimed against a lessee were treated as time-barred under Section 56(2) of the Electricity Act, 2003 because recovery notices came after the two-year period from when the sum first became due, and later notices could not revive limitation once supply had been disconnected and the agreement terminated. The text also states that, after the respondents invoked the statutory revenue recovery mechanism for the same dues, they could not additionally use disconnection under Section 56(1) as a coercive recovery tool, absent bona fide billing error. Disconnection was therefore not permissible, while recovery through the revenue recovery process could continue. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 25 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468824