<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (5) TMI 1239 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792037</link>
    <description>Fraudulent trading under Section 66 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code may be established through cogent circumstances showing concealment and diversion of corporate assets. Where subsidiary shareholding was sold, the investment remained recorded in financial statements and sale proceeds were not accounted for, the persons concerned must satisfactorily explain the transactions once adequate material indicates wrongful conduct. The resulting contribution of diverted proceeds to the corporate debtor&#039;s assets was maintained. Investigation by the Serious Fraud Investigation Office, however, cannot be directly ordered by the Adjudicating Authority because the Companies Act assigns that discretion to the Central Government; the direction was set aside and referred for consideration under the prescribed procedure.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 May 2026 07:06:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=903268" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (5) TMI 1239 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792037</link>
      <description>Fraudulent trading under Section 66 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code may be established through cogent circumstances showing concealment and diversion of corporate assets. Where subsidiary shareholding was sold, the investment remained recorded in financial statements and sale proceeds were not accounted for, the persons concerned must satisfactorily explain the transactions once adequate material indicates wrongful conduct. The resulting contribution of diverted proceeds to the corporate debtor&#039;s assets was maintained. Investigation by the Serious Fraud Investigation Office, however, cannot be directly ordered by the Adjudicating Authority because the Companies Act assigns that discretion to the Central Government; the direction was set aside and referred for consideration under the prescribed procedure.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792037</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>