https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792042 Re-export of goods was the central issue, with the Bombay HC record noting that permissions were to be granted for re-export, but the matter was only adjourned and not finally concluded. The petition was rejected because no material was placed on record to show that the petitioner had taken steps to re-export the goods, and the Court was therefore not inclined to entertain the petition. The note reflects that relief depended on demonstrated action toward re-export, rather than a bare request for permission. en-us Wed, 06 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 22 May 2026 07:06:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792042 Re-export of goods was the central issue, with the Bombay HC record noting that permissions were to be granted for re-export, but the matter was only adjourned and not finally concluded. The petition was rejected because no material was placed on record to show that the petitioner had taken steps to re-export the goods, and the Court was therefore not inclined to entertain the petition. The note reflects that relief depended on demonstrated action toward re-export, rather than a bare request for permission. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 06 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792042