<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (5) TMI 1250 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792048</link>
    <description>Export incentive received under the Focus Product Scheme was treated as a capital receipt because it was directed towards market expansion rather than revenue operations. The claim, raised during assessment by letter, had to be examined on merits, and the issue was taken as covered by a coordinate bench ruling on identical facts in the immediately succeeding assessment year. On that basis, the incentive was held not to be assessable as income and the assessee&#039;s claim was accepted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 May 2026 15:17:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=903257" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (5) TMI 1250 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792048</link>
      <description>Export incentive received under the Focus Product Scheme was treated as a capital receipt because it was directed towards market expansion rather than revenue operations. The claim, raised during assessment by letter, had to be examined on merits, and the issue was taken as covered by a coordinate bench ruling on identical facts in the immediately succeeding assessment year. On that basis, the incentive was held not to be assessable as income and the assessee&#039;s claim was accepted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792048</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>