<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (5) TMI 1264 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792062</link>
    <description>Penalty for delayed payment of self-assessment tax was considered unsustainable after the 1987 amendment to section 140A(3), which treats default primarily as a recovery mechanism for tax and interest. The analysis noted that, because the earlier penal consequence for non-payment was omitted and section 221(1) was not correspondingly amended, levy of penalty for such delay lacked legal basis. On that reasoning, the penalty was deleted and the assessee&#039;s challenge succeeded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 May 2026 07:06:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=903243" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (5) TMI 1264 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792062</link>
      <description>Penalty for delayed payment of self-assessment tax was considered unsustainable after the 1987 amendment to section 140A(3), which treats default primarily as a recovery mechanism for tax and interest. The analysis noted that, because the earlier penal consequence for non-payment was omitted and section 221(1) was not correspondingly amended, levy of penalty for such delay lacked legal basis. On that reasoning, the penalty was deleted and the assessee&#039;s challenge succeeded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792062</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>