<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (1) TMI 168 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51845</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the duty demand of Rs. 70,694 on stolen goods, ruling that the goods were complete and marketable even without testing. The appellants&#039; arguments based on a Trade Notice and a letter from the Superintendent were rejected. The Tribunal found that the theft did not justify remission of duty, as the goods were considered fully manufactured and marketable. The impugned order was upheld, dismissing the appeal for lack of merit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2010 18:05:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=90323" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (1) TMI 168 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51845</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the duty demand of Rs. 70,694 on stolen goods, ruling that the goods were complete and marketable even without testing. The appellants&#039; arguments based on a Trade Notice and a letter from the Superintendent were rejected. The Tribunal found that the theft did not justify remission of duty, as the goods were considered fully manufactured and marketable. The impugned order was upheld, dismissing the appeal for lack of merit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51845</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>