<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (2) TMI 102 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51843</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, New Delhi, ruled that affixing stickers on imported goods, specifically chocolates, did not amount to manufacturing under Note 3 to Chapter 18 of the Central Excise Tariff Act. The Tribunal considered precedents and legal provisions, concluding that the goods were marketable even before the stickers were added. Citing cases such as Panchsheel Soap Factory and Manisha International Pvt. Ltd., the Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal, emphasizing the distinction between affixing stickers and manufacturing activities. The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order in favor of the Appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Feb 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2010 18:00:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=90321" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (2) TMI 102 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51843</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, New Delhi, ruled that affixing stickers on imported goods, specifically chocolates, did not amount to manufacturing under Note 3 to Chapter 18 of the Central Excise Tariff Act. The Tribunal considered precedents and legal provisions, concluding that the goods were marketable even before the stickers were added. Citing cases such as Panchsheel Soap Factory and Manisha International Pvt. Ltd., the Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal, emphasizing the distinction between affixing stickers and manufacturing activities. The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order in favor of the Appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Feb 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51843</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>