<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Make available test under India-UAE DTAA barred tax on advisory fees absent technical know-how transfer and permanent establishment.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=100027</link>
    <description>Payments to a UAE entity for advisory and consultative services were not fees for technical services because the services did not make available any technical know-how, process or methodology enabling independent future use by the recipient. In the absence of a specific FTS article in the India-UAE DTAA, domestic section 9(1)(vii) could not be imported to tax the remittance under the treaty. With no permanent establishment of the UAE entity in India, the income was treated as business profits under Article 7 and not taxable in India. A CBDT circular could not enlarge taxability contrary to the treaty, so the payer was not in default under sections 201(1) and 201(1A) and the demand was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2026 07:06:44 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 May 2026 07:06:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=903204" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Make available test under India-UAE DTAA barred tax on advisory fees absent technical know-how transfer and permanent establishment.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=100027</link>
      <description>Payments to a UAE entity for advisory and consultative services were not fees for technical services because the services did not make available any technical know-how, process or methodology enabling independent future use by the recipient. In the absence of a specific FTS article in the India-UAE DTAA, domestic section 9(1)(vii) could not be imported to tax the remittance under the treaty. With no permanent establishment of the UAE entity in India, the income was treated as business profits under Article 7 and not taxable in India. A CBDT circular could not enlarge taxability contrary to the treaty, so the payer was not in default under sections 201(1) and 201(1A) and the demand was deleted.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2026 07:06:44 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=100027</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>