<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (2) TMI 101 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51842</link>
    <description>The court classified the Tarpaulin Cloth under Heading No. 52.06 instead of 59.06 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, as no visible layer formation was present. The use of power in manufacturing tarpaulins led to the imposition of Central Excise duty, with the issue of small scale exemption and penalty left for further determination by the respective authorities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Feb 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2010 17:58:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=90320" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (2) TMI 101 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51842</link>
      <description>The court classified the Tarpaulin Cloth under Heading No. 52.06 instead of 59.06 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, as no visible layer formation was present. The use of power in manufacturing tarpaulins led to the imposition of Central Excise duty, with the issue of small scale exemption and penalty left for further determination by the respective authorities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Feb 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51842</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>