<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Natural justice in export authorisation relief requires a reasoned order and personal hearing before rejecting genuine hardship claims.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=100014</link>
    <description>Relaxation under the FTP for genuine hardship requires a meaningful, reasoned consideration of the exporter&#039;s specific case, and administrative orders affecting rights must disclose cogent reasons rather than mechanical conclusions. The Court found that the authorities failed to address the claimed technical non-transmission of authorisation data, the asserted fulfilment of export obligations, and repeated requests for relief, and also denied a personal hearing despite specific requests. On that basis, the orders were set aside for non-application of mind and breach of natural justice, and the matter was remanded for fresh consideration with an effective hearing and a reasoned order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2026 07:06:44 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 May 2026 07:06:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=903191" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Natural justice in export authorisation relief requires a reasoned order and personal hearing before rejecting genuine hardship claims.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=100014</link>
      <description>Relaxation under the FTP for genuine hardship requires a meaningful, reasoned consideration of the exporter&#039;s specific case, and administrative orders affecting rights must disclose cogent reasons rather than mechanical conclusions. The Court found that the authorities failed to address the claimed technical non-transmission of authorisation data, the asserted fulfilment of export obligations, and repeated requests for relief, and also denied a personal hearing despite specific requests. On that basis, the orders were set aside for non-application of mind and breach of natural justice, and the matter was remanded for fresh consideration with an effective hearing and a reasoned order.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2026 07:06:44 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=100014</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>