<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (2) TMI 100 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51841</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the case to the adjudicating authority for re-determination of duty payable, extending benefits as per guidelines. The re-calculation should exclude additional duty under the Textiles and Textile Articles Act and apply effective duty rates for CVD computation. Penalty was set aside due to bona fide belief and interpretation issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2010 17:53:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=90319" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (2) TMI 100 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51841</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the case to the adjudicating authority for re-determination of duty payable, extending benefits as per guidelines. The re-calculation should exclude additional duty under the Textiles and Textile Articles Act and apply effective duty rates for CVD computation. Penalty was set aside due to bona fide belief and interpretation issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51841</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>