https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468798 Article 356 is subject to judicial review, and a Proclamation cannot stand unless the President's satisfaction rests on objective, relevant and verified material showing constitutional breakdown. Irrelevant, unverified, partisan or mala fide material cannot justify the emergency power, and legislative disputes or alleged procedural irregularities do not replace the constitutionally required floor test for testing confidence in the House. The Court also noted that alleged suppression of facts did not warrant of relief where the issues were of constitutional importance and the relevant material was substantially before the Court. The impugned action was quashed, status quo ante restored, and the elected Government was directed to revive. en-us Thu, 21 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 21 May 2026 17:49:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468798 Article 356 is subject to judicial review, and a Proclamation cannot stand unless the President's satisfaction rests on objective, relevant and verified material showing constitutional breakdown. Irrelevant, unverified, partisan or mala fide material cannot justify the emergency power, and legislative disputes or alleged procedural irregularities do not replace the constitutionally required floor test for testing confidence in the House. The Court also noted that alleged suppression of facts did not warrant of relief where the issues were of constitutional importance and the relevant material was substantially before the Court. The impugned action was quashed, status quo ante restored, and the elected Government was directed to revive. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 21 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468798