https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51835 The Tribunal held that the appellant was not entitled to claim a refund for duty paid against demands that were confirmed but not appealed against. The decision was based on the interpretation of Rule 233B and the lack of appeal filed by the appellant against the orders confirming the demands. The Tribunal's ruling aligned with the principle that filing an appeal should be considered a form of protest against the demand, which was not done by the appellant in this case. en-us Mon, 13 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 28 Sep 2010 17:41:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51835 The Tribunal held that the appellant was not entitled to claim a refund for duty paid against demands that were confirmed but not appealed against. The decision was based on the interpretation of Rule 233B and the lack of appeal filed by the appellant against the orders confirming the demands. The Tribunal's ruling aligned with the principle that filing an appeal should be considered a form of protest against the demand, which was not done by the appellant in this case. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 13 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51835