<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Section 16(2)(c) of the CGST Act: Constitutionally Valid, But at What Cost to Honest Buyers?</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=16465</link>
    <description>Input tax credit under the CGST regime may be denied where the supplier fails to deposit tax, even if the recipient holds valid invoices, the supply is reflected in return data, the goods or services have been received, and no other disqualifying restriction applies. The commentary explains that Section 16(2)(c) creates hardship for bona fide purchasers who cannot independently verify invoice-level tax payment in real time, while the revenue treats input tax credit as a statutory concession subject to strict conditions. The Gujarat High Court upheld the constitutional validity of the provision, declined to read it down, and distinguished VAT-based precedent, while calling for better technological and legislative safeguards for honest buyers.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2026 08:31:41 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 May 2026 08:31:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=903095" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Section 16(2)(c) of the CGST Act: Constitutionally Valid, But at What Cost to Honest Buyers?</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=16465</link>
      <description>Input tax credit under the CGST regime may be denied where the supplier fails to deposit tax, even if the recipient holds valid invoices, the supply is reflected in return data, the goods or services have been received, and no other disqualifying restriction applies. The commentary explains that Section 16(2)(c) creates hardship for bona fide purchasers who cannot independently verify invoice-level tax payment in real time, while the revenue treats input tax credit as a statutory concession subject to strict conditions. The Gujarat High Court upheld the constitutional validity of the provision, declined to read it down, and distinguished VAT-based precedent, while calling for better technological and legislative safeguards for honest buyers.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Goods and Services Tax - GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2026 08:31:41 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=16465</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>