<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (5) TMI 1168 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791966</link>
    <description>Bail under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 was extended after the Court considered that co-accused had already obtained bail, the accused was of advanced age, and he had remained in custody for more than two years. Those factors justified grant of bail, and the impugned order was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 May 2026 08:30:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=903083" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (5) TMI 1168 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791966</link>
      <description>Bail under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 was extended after the Court considered that co-accused had already obtained bail, the accused was of advanced age, and he had remained in custody for more than two years. Those factors justified grant of bail, and the impugned order was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791966</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>