<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (5) TMI 1170 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791968</link>
    <description>An advance made by a director to a corporate debtor was reflected in the company&#039;s books as long-term borrowings, and correspondence suggested funds were infused by promoters and directors for working capital in proportion to shareholding. However, other material, including references to a share purchase arrangement and a gift deed relating to recovery of the amount, left the true character of the transaction unclear. On that basis, the existing record was insufficient to conclusively determine whether the amount constituted financial debt under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, and the matter required remand for a fuller merits-based examination of the transaction&#039;s nature.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 May 2026 08:30:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=903081" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (5) TMI 1170 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791968</link>
      <description>An advance made by a director to a corporate debtor was reflected in the company&#039;s books as long-term borrowings, and correspondence suggested funds were infused by promoters and directors for working capital in proportion to shareholding. However, other material, including references to a share purchase arrangement and a gift deed relating to recovery of the amount, left the true character of the transaction unclear. On that basis, the existing record was insufficient to conclusively determine whether the amount constituted financial debt under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, and the matter required remand for a fuller merits-based examination of the transaction&#039;s nature.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791968</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>