<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (1) TMI 160 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51830</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the process of converting &#039;soft serve mix&#039; to &#039;soft serve&#039; amounts to manufacture. The product &#039;soft serve&#039; was classified under Sub-Heading 2108.91 as an edible preparation not elsewhere specified. The Tribunal also determined that &#039;soft serve&#039; is eligible for the Small Scale Exemption as it does not bear any brand name. Both appeals were disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2010 16:46:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=90308" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (1) TMI 160 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51830</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the process of converting &#039;soft serve mix&#039; to &#039;soft serve&#039; amounts to manufacture. The product &#039;soft serve&#039; was classified under Sub-Heading 2108.91 as an edible preparation not elsewhere specified. The Tribunal also determined that &#039;soft serve&#039; is eligible for the Small Scale Exemption as it does not bear any brand name. Both appeals were disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51830</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>