<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (5) TMI 1173 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791971</link>
    <description>Territorial jurisdiction for complaints under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 is governed by the special statutory scheme linking trial to the place where the corporate person&#039;s registered office is situated. Section 236 of the Code, read with Section 436(1)(a) of the Companies Act, 2013, requires cognizance before the competent Special Court, and this special regime overrides the general territorial rules under the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. A complaint concerning a corporate person with its registered office in New Delhi could not be entertained by the Gwalior court, and had to be presented before the appropriate Special Court there.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 May 2026 08:30:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=903078" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (5) TMI 1173 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791971</link>
      <description>Territorial jurisdiction for complaints under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 is governed by the special statutory scheme linking trial to the place where the corporate person&#039;s registered office is situated. Section 236 of the Code, read with Section 436(1)(a) of the Companies Act, 2013, requires cognizance before the competent Special Court, and this special regime overrides the general territorial rules under the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. A complaint concerning a corporate person with its registered office in New Delhi could not be entertained by the Gwalior court, and had to be presented before the appropriate Special Court there.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791971</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>