<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (5) TMI 1175 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791973</link>
    <description>Imported goods were treated as relays under CTI 8536 49 00 because their essential function was control, protection and supervision of electrical systems, while monitoring features were merely ancillary; the residual classification under CTI 8536 90 90 was rejected. Goods with a contact rating of 5 amperes met the exemption condition for relays up to 7 amperes under Notification No. 12/2012, so the three non-MICOM products qualified for exemption, while MICOM relays did not because their rating exceeded the limit. As the classification and exemption issues were resolved on the record, the related penalties under the Customs Act were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 May 2026 08:30:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=903076" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (5) TMI 1175 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791973</link>
      <description>Imported goods were treated as relays under CTI 8536 49 00 because their essential function was control, protection and supervision of electrical systems, while monitoring features were merely ancillary; the residual classification under CTI 8536 90 90 was rejected. Goods with a contact rating of 5 amperes met the exemption condition for relays up to 7 amperes under Notification No. 12/2012, so the three non-MICOM products qualified for exemption, while MICOM relays did not because their rating exceeded the limit. As the classification and exemption issues were resolved on the record, the related penalties under the Customs Act were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791973</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>