<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (5) TMI 1196 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791994</link>
    <description>Delay of 973 days in filing the appeal was held to be supported by sufficient cause, with the Covid-19 lockdown disruption and delayed service of assessment and recovery communications accepted on the facts. The Tribunal therefore treated the limitation default as condonable and set aside the first appellate authority&#039;s dismissal in limine. The matter was restored for fresh adjudication on merits after granting the assessee an opportunity of hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 May 2026 08:30:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=903055" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (5) TMI 1196 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791994</link>
      <description>Delay of 973 days in filing the appeal was held to be supported by sufficient cause, with the Covid-19 lockdown disruption and delayed service of assessment and recovery communications accepted on the facts. The Tribunal therefore treated the limitation default as condonable and set aside the first appellate authority&#039;s dismissal in limine. The matter was restored for fresh adjudication on merits after granting the assessee an opportunity of hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791994</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>