<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (5) TMI 1214 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792012</link>
    <description>In tax proceedings after an assessee&#039;s death, &quot;legal representative&quot; under the Income-tax Act has a wider meaning than &quot;legal heir&quot; under succession law, and notice served on a person who had already represented himself as legal representative was not invalid merely because he was not a Class I heir. However, where reassessment was sought under the extended limitation regime, approval had to be granted by the higher authority specified by section 151(ii); approval by the Principal Commissioner was not in conformity with that requirement and was therefore invalid. As a result, the reassessment notice could not be sustained because the mandatory approval condition was not met.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 May 2026 08:30:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=903037" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (5) TMI 1214 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792012</link>
      <description>In tax proceedings after an assessee&#039;s death, &quot;legal representative&quot; under the Income-tax Act has a wider meaning than &quot;legal heir&quot; under succession law, and notice served on a person who had already represented himself as legal representative was not invalid merely because he was not a Class I heir. However, where reassessment was sought under the extended limitation regime, approval had to be granted by the higher authority specified by section 151(ii); approval by the Principal Commissioner was not in conformity with that requirement and was therefore invalid. As a result, the reassessment notice could not be sustained because the mandatory approval condition was not met.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792012</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>