<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (1) TMI 156 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51825</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal against the Adjudication Order for customs duty, penalty, and confiscation of imported goods. It was found that the goods were not used in the factory as required by the Notification conditions, leading to liability for confiscation and penalty. The Tribunal ruled that Customs Authorities have jurisdiction to demand duty and impose penalties. The confiscation order was set aside, and the penalty was reduced to Rs. 10,000.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2010 16:33:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=90303" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (1) TMI 156 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51825</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal against the Adjudication Order for customs duty, penalty, and confiscation of imported goods. It was found that the goods were not used in the factory as required by the Notification conditions, leading to liability for confiscation and penalty. The Tribunal ruled that Customs Authorities have jurisdiction to demand duty and impose penalties. The confiscation order was set aside, and the penalty was reduced to Rs. 10,000.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51825</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>