<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (1) TMI 152 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51821</link>
    <description>Shikakai Herbal Powder was treated as a hair preparation under Chapter sub-heading 3305.90 because its marketing, packaging and literature showed use for cleansing and beautifying hair, not treatment of disease. Chapter Note 2 of Chapter 33 was applied to goods put up as cosmetics or toilet preparations with only subsidiary curative value, and the presence of herbal ingredients or a drug licence did not determine excise classification. The assessee&#039;s reliance on an earlier Supreme Court decision was distinguished on facts, and a similar Tribunal view on hair products was followed, leaving the product outside Ayurvedic medicament classification under 3003.30 and outside the claimed notification benefit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2010 16:22:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=90299" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (1) TMI 152 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51821</link>
      <description>Shikakai Herbal Powder was treated as a hair preparation under Chapter sub-heading 3305.90 because its marketing, packaging and literature showed use for cleansing and beautifying hair, not treatment of disease. Chapter Note 2 of Chapter 33 was applied to goods put up as cosmetics or toilet preparations with only subsidiary curative value, and the presence of herbal ingredients or a drug licence did not determine excise classification. The assessee&#039;s reliance on an earlier Supreme Court decision was distinguished on facts, and a similar Tribunal view on hair products was followed, leaving the product outside Ayurvedic medicament classification under 3003.30 and outside the claimed notification benefit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51821</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>