<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (2) TMI 1887 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468774</link>
    <description>Delay of 35 and 76 days in filing the appeals was condoned because the assessees supported the applications with affidavits and showed sufficient cause, particularly in the Covid period. The ex parte best judgment assessments and appellate orders arising from additions for cash deposits in a joint bank account were set aside because the assessees had not been given an effective opportunity to explain the source of the deposits. The matter was remanded for de novo assessment before the Assessing Officer, with factual verification of ownership and source, and the same deposit was not to be taxed again in the wife&#039;s hands if it was established in the husband&#039;s hands.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 May 2026 19:00:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=902979" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (2) TMI 1887 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468774</link>
      <description>Delay of 35 and 76 days in filing the appeals was condoned because the assessees supported the applications with affidavits and showed sufficient cause, particularly in the Covid period. The ex parte best judgment assessments and appellate orders arising from additions for cash deposits in a joint bank account were set aside because the assessees had not been given an effective opportunity to explain the source of the deposits. The matter was remanded for de novo assessment before the Assessing Officer, with factual verification of ownership and source, and the same deposit was not to be taxed again in the wife&#039;s hands if it was established in the husband&#039;s hands.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468774</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>