<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (1) TMI 150 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51819</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that calcined pyrophyllite is appropriately classified under Heading 25.05 of the Central Excise Tariff Act. The decision was based on historical classifications, the structure of the tariff, and alignment with similar products. The Tribunal emphasized the significance of considering historical interpretations and tariff structure in classification disputes, providing clarity on the classification of calcined pyrophyllite.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2010 15:52:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=90297" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (1) TMI 150 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51819</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that calcined pyrophyllite is appropriately classified under Heading 25.05 of the Central Excise Tariff Act. The decision was based on historical classifications, the structure of the tariff, and alignment with similar products. The Tribunal emphasized the significance of considering historical interpretations and tariff structure in classification disputes, providing clarity on the classification of calcined pyrophyllite.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51819</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>