<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (7) TMI 1779 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468789</link>
    <description>Receipts from software licence-related implementation, enhancement, maintenance, consultancy and training services were treated as non-taxable Fees for Technical Services under the India-UK DTAA because the Revenue did not prove that technical knowledge, experience or know-how was made available for independent use. Ancillary support linked to software utilisation did not, by itself, satisfy the make available test. Reimbursed travelling and lodging expenses were also not sustained as FTS on the facts recorded, especially where the matter had already been remanded for verification. The impugned additions on both heads were therefore not sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 May 2026 19:00:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=902964" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (7) TMI 1779 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468789</link>
      <description>Receipts from software licence-related implementation, enhancement, maintenance, consultancy and training services were treated as non-taxable Fees for Technical Services under the India-UK DTAA because the Revenue did not prove that technical knowledge, experience or know-how was made available for independent use. Ancillary support linked to software utilisation did not, by itself, satisfy the make available test. Reimbursed travelling and lodging expenses were also not sustained as FTS on the facts recorded, especially where the matter had already been remanded for verification. The impugned additions on both heads were therefore not sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468789</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>