<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 2157 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468761</link>
    <description>Section 14A read with Rule 8D cannot be applied mechanically where the assessee claims that investments in sister concerns were made from its own non-interest bearing funds and the record contains no finding on any cost attributable to earning exempt income. On those facts, the disallowance could not be sustained without proper factual examination. The ITAT therefore set aside the disallowance and remitted the matter to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 May 2026 11:16:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=902933" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 2157 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468761</link>
      <description>Section 14A read with Rule 8D cannot be applied mechanically where the assessee claims that investments in sister concerns were made from its own non-interest bearing funds and the record contains no finding on any cost attributable to earning exempt income. On those facts, the disallowance could not be sustained without proper factual examination. The ITAT therefore set aside the disallowance and remitted the matter to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468761</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>