<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (2) TMI 298 - CEGAT, COURT NO. IV, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51813</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Court No. IV, New Delhi dismissed stay petitions as premature due to the duty amount not being quantified. The appeals concerning Service Tax on Goods Transport Operator Services for the specified period were rejected following the enactment of Sections 116 and 117 of the Finance Act, 2000, which mandated the payment of Service Tax.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2010 15:19:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=90291" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (2) TMI 298 - CEGAT, COURT NO. IV, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51813</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Court No. IV, New Delhi dismissed stay petitions as premature due to the duty amount not being quantified. The appeals concerning Service Tax on Goods Transport Operator Services for the specified period were rejected following the enactment of Sections 116 and 117 of the Finance Act, 2000, which mandated the payment of Service Tax.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51813</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>