<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (5) TMI 1109 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791907</link>
    <description>Customs valuation under Section 14 of the Customs Act, 1962 read with Rule 12(2) of the Customs Valuation Rules, 2007 requires the proper officer to record and communicate reasons for doubting the declared transaction value before rejecting it and reassessing. A written acceptance of enhanced value does not, by itself, extinguish the importer&#039;s right to challenge the valuation, especially where the letters show clearance under protest rather than unconditional consent. The later Delhi High Court view noted that written acceptance under Section 17(5) only dispenses with a speaking order; it does not waive the statutory safeguards in Rule 12(2) or bar challenge to the reassessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 May 2026 08:31:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=902885" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (5) TMI 1109 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791907</link>
      <description>Customs valuation under Section 14 of the Customs Act, 1962 read with Rule 12(2) of the Customs Valuation Rules, 2007 requires the proper officer to record and communicate reasons for doubting the declared transaction value before rejecting it and reassessing. A written acceptance of enhanced value does not, by itself, extinguish the importer&#039;s right to challenge the valuation, especially where the letters show clearance under protest rather than unconditional consent. The later Delhi High Court view noted that written acceptance under Section 17(5) only dispenses with a speaking order; it does not waive the statutory safeguards in Rule 12(2) or bar challenge to the reassessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791907</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>