<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (5) TMI 1116 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791914</link>
    <description>Penalty under section 112(b) of the Customs Act cannot be sustained on uncorroborated third-party records or statements recorded under section 108 unless the evidentiary requirements of section 138B are complied with. Where no independent material supports the alleged purchase, receipt, or dealing in goods, and the record does not establish conscious involvement or knowledge that the goods were liable to confiscation, the essential ingredients of section 112(b) remain unproved. On that basis, the penalty was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 May 2026 08:31:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=902878" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (5) TMI 1116 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791914</link>
      <description>Penalty under section 112(b) of the Customs Act cannot be sustained on uncorroborated third-party records or statements recorded under section 108 unless the evidentiary requirements of section 138B are complied with. Where no independent material supports the alleged purchase, receipt, or dealing in goods, and the record does not establish conscious involvement or knowledge that the goods were liable to confiscation, the essential ingredients of section 112(b) remain unproved. On that basis, the penalty was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791914</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>