<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (5) TMI 1131 - ITAT GAUHATI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791929</link>
    <description>Cash deposits could not be added as unexplained income where the assessee&#039;s explanation that they arose from agricultural floriculture operations was not disproved. The verification report accepted that agricultural activity was carried on, and no contrary evidence showed any other source of income or established an undisclosed source for the deposits. An addition based only on doubt and suspicion was therefore not sustainable, and the addition was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 May 2026 08:31:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=902863" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (5) TMI 1131 - ITAT GAUHATI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791929</link>
      <description>Cash deposits could not be added as unexplained income where the assessee&#039;s explanation that they arose from agricultural floriculture operations was not disproved. The verification report accepted that agricultural activity was carried on, and no contrary evidence showed any other source of income or established an undisclosed source for the deposits. An addition based only on doubt and suspicion was therefore not sustainable, and the addition was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791929</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>