<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (5) TMI 1134 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791932</link>
    <description>Penalty under section 270A(9)(e) of the Income-tax Act could not be sustained where it rested only on entries in a third party&#039;s software ledger and statements of persons linked to that third party. The assessee&#039;s books, invoices, bank records and reconciliation, together with demonstrated discrepancies in the disputed ledger, undermined the Revenue&#039;s case. Material seized from the searched person carried a statutory presumption only against that person and was not conclusive against the assessee. In the absence of independent corroboration and effective cross-examination of the relied-upon witnesses, the third-party entries were unsafe to found penal liability on, and the penalty was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 May 2026 16:07:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=902860" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (5) TMI 1134 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791932</link>
      <description>Penalty under section 270A(9)(e) of the Income-tax Act could not be sustained where it rested only on entries in a third party&#039;s software ledger and statements of persons linked to that third party. The assessee&#039;s books, invoices, bank records and reconciliation, together with demonstrated discrepancies in the disputed ledger, undermined the Revenue&#039;s case. Material seized from the searched person carried a statutory presumption only against that person and was not conclusive against the assessee. In the absence of independent corroboration and effective cross-examination of the relied-upon witnesses, the third-party entries were unsafe to found penal liability on, and the penalty was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791932</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>