<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (5) TMI 1137 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791935</link>
    <description>Penalty for concealment under section 271(1)(c) could not survive once the underlying quantum addition relating to section 80IA deduction had been deleted in the assessee&#039;s own case. The penalty was founded on the same addition made in assessment, and with that disallowance no longer surviving in appeal, there remained no basis to sustain any finding of concealment or tax sought to be evaded. The concealment penalty was therefore deleted, granting relief to the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 May 2026 08:31:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=902857" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (5) TMI 1137 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791935</link>
      <description>Penalty for concealment under section 271(1)(c) could not survive once the underlying quantum addition relating to section 80IA deduction had been deleted in the assessee&#039;s own case. The penalty was founded on the same addition made in assessment, and with that disallowance no longer surviving in appeal, there remained no basis to sustain any finding of concealment or tax sought to be evaded. The concealment penalty was therefore deleted, granting relief to the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791935</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>