<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (5) TMI 1138 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791936</link>
    <description>Penalty under section 271(1)(c) requires concealment of income or furnishing of inaccurate particulars together with tax sought to be evaded. On the facts recorded, that element was absent because no concealed income was brought to tax and no addition survived in the assessment. The dispute arose only from a mismatch between the return of income and the tax audit report. The penalty was therefore not leviable and was deleted, with relief granted to the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 May 2026 08:31:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=902856" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (5) TMI 1138 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791936</link>
      <description>Penalty under section 271(1)(c) requires concealment of income or furnishing of inaccurate particulars together with tax sought to be evaded. On the facts recorded, that element was absent because no concealed income was brought to tax and no addition survived in the assessment. The dispute arose only from a mismatch between the return of income and the tax audit report. The penalty was therefore not leviable and was deleted, with relief granted to the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791936</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>