<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Reassessment invalid for want of proper sanction and a genuine reason to believe; delayed cross-objections were not admitted.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=99950</link>
    <description>Reassessment was quashed because the recorded reasons suffered from fundamental defects: no proper approval in the prescribed form, absence of signature on sanction, and material factual errors in the basis for reopening. The assessing officer&#039;s later attempt to substitute fresh reasons was not permitted under section 147, and the alternative reasons still rested on suspicion, third-party information about the assessee&#039;s husband, and no independent tangible material showing escapement in the assessee&#039;s own case. The Tribunal held this amounted only to a reason to suspect, not a valid reason to believe. Cross-objections were also rejected as time-barred, since they were filed 27 days late without any condonation request.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2026 08:31:08 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 May 2026 08:31:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=902820" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Reassessment invalid for want of proper sanction and a genuine reason to believe; delayed cross-objections were not admitted.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=99950</link>
      <description>Reassessment was quashed because the recorded reasons suffered from fundamental defects: no proper approval in the prescribed form, absence of signature on sanction, and material factual errors in the basis for reopening. The assessing officer&#039;s later attempt to substitute fresh reasons was not permitted under section 147, and the alternative reasons still rested on suspicion, third-party information about the assessee&#039;s husband, and no independent tangible material showing escapement in the assessee&#039;s own case. The Tribunal held this amounted only to a reason to suspect, not a valid reason to believe. Cross-objections were also rejected as time-barred, since they were filed 27 days late without any condonation request.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2026 08:31:08 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=99950</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>