<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (3) TMI 198 - CEGAT, COURT NO. II, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51802</link>
    <description>The court upheld the clubbing of clearances, duty demands, and confiscations based on established relationships and operational control. Penalties and fines were adjusted, considering individual roles and mitigating factors. All three appeals were disposed of with modified penalties, while duty demands and confiscations were upheld due to established financial connections and shared operational control.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2010 14:47:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=90280" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (3) TMI 198 - CEGAT, COURT NO. II, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51802</link>
      <description>The court upheld the clubbing of clearances, duty demands, and confiscations based on established relationships and operational control. Penalties and fines were adjusted, considering individual roles and mitigating factors. All three appeals were disposed of with modified penalties, while duty demands and confiscations were upheld due to established financial connections and shared operational control.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51802</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>