https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468730 A second bail application was refused after an earlier rejection on merits and dismissal of the SLP, because the record showed no sufficient change in circumstances and continued allegations of the applicant's active involvement in the offence. The Court considered the prosecution version, charge-sheet, sanction for prosecution, search and seizure material, and the alleged role in the conspiracy and raid. A comparison with the co-accused's bail did not establish parity, as the applicant's position was not found to be the same. The application was therefore rejected, reflecting the principle that repeated bail requests will not succeed without a material basis to depart from the earlier refusal. en-us Thu, 12 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 19 May 2026 18:56:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468730 A second bail application was refused after an earlier rejection on merits and dismissal of the SLP, because the record showed no sufficient change in circumstances and continued allegations of the applicant's active involvement in the offence. The Court considered the prosecution version, charge-sheet, sanction for prosecution, search and seizure material, and the alleged role in the conspiracy and raid. A comparison with the co-accused's bail did not establish parity, as the applicant's position was not found to be the same. The application was therefore rejected, reflecting the principle that repeated bail requests will not succeed without a material basis to depart from the earlier refusal. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 12 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468730