<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (12) TMI 190 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51799</link>
    <description>Penalty is unsustainable where the duty demand has been dropped for no short-levy and no contravention of the Act or Rules is found. The analysis states that, once the demand itself was not pursued and no statutory or procedural breach was recorded, absence of prior departmental permission alone could not provide an independent legal basis for penalty. The penalty was therefore set aside in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2010 14:43:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=90277" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (12) TMI 190 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51799</link>
      <description>Penalty is unsustainable where the duty demand has been dropped for no short-levy and no contravention of the Act or Rules is found. The analysis states that, once the demand itself was not pursued and no statutory or procedural breach was recorded, absence of prior departmental permission alone could not provide an independent legal basis for penalty. The penalty was therefore set aside in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51799</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>