<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (2) TMI 294 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51796</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessees in a refund claim case under the Central Excise Act, 1944. The court concluded that the duty burden had not been passed on to buyers, entitling the assessees to the refund. The judgment emphasized the satisfaction of all conditions under Section 11B and the prevention of unjust enrichment. The final order granted the refund claim, upholding the Commissioner (Appeals) decision and clarifying the criteria for refund eligibility.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2010 14:38:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=90274" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (2) TMI 294 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51796</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessees in a refund claim case under the Central Excise Act, 1944. The court concluded that the duty burden had not been passed on to buyers, entitling the assessees to the refund. The judgment emphasized the satisfaction of all conditions under Section 11B and the prevention of unjust enrichment. The final order granted the refund claim, upholding the Commissioner (Appeals) decision and clarifying the criteria for refund eligibility.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51796</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>