<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Regarding ensuring proper compliance of the judgment delivered by the Hon’ble High Court in case of Writ Tax No. 1029/2021</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/circulars?id=70081</link>
    <description>Strict compliance with the principles of natural justice under Section 75(4) of the CGST/UPGST Act, 2017 was directed in GST adjudication proceedings where an adverse decision was contemplated. The communication forwards the High Court&#039;s order and instructs all officers and assessing authorities to adhere to the mandatory opportunity of personal hearing and the broader principles of natural justice while acting under the GST law. It also notes that the impugned adjudication order under Section 74 could not be sustained because the dealer was not afforded the required hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 May 2026 11:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=902730" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Regarding ensuring proper compliance of the judgment delivered by the Hon’ble High Court in case of Writ Tax No. 1029/2021</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/circulars?id=70081</link>
      <description>Strict compliance with the principles of natural justice under Section 75(4) of the CGST/UPGST Act, 2017 was directed in GST adjudication proceedings where an adverse decision was contemplated. The communication forwards the High Court&#039;s order and instructs all officers and assessing authorities to adhere to the mandatory opportunity of personal hearing and the broader principles of natural justice while acting under the GST law. It also notes that the impugned adjudication order under Section 74 could not be sustained because the dealer was not afforded the required hearing.</description>
      <category>Circulars</category>
      <law>GST - States</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/circulars?id=70081</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>